Detecting of biofilm formation in the clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli: an evaluation of different screening methods

Amin Mohsenzadeh, Alireza Fazel, Shirin Bavari, Sanaz Borji, Sahar Pourasghar, Taher Azimi, Hoda Sabati

Abstract


Biofilm producer bacteria cause nosocomial, chronic, and recurrent human infections. It is hard to treat biofilm-embedded bacteria because they are more resistant to antimicrobials than planktonic bacteria. The present study aimed to investigate different methods for detecting biofilms in the clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The study was carried out at the Department of Microbiology, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran, from January 2019 to June 2019. A total of 320 clinical samples were collected from educational and medical centers in Tehran, Iran which from them 100 isolates of E. coli and P. aeruginosa were identified by standard microbiological procedures and subjected to biofilm detection methods. Biofilm detection was tested by Congo red agar (CRA), tube method (TM), microtiter plate assay (MTPA). The MTPA was considered to be superior to CRA and tube TM. From the total of 100 clinical isolates, MTPA detected 38 (38%) isolates as biofilm-positive phenotype, of which 30 as strong, and 8 as moderate biofilm-forming isolates. It can be concluded from the current study that the MTPA is a more quantitative and dependable assay for the detection of biofilm-forming microorganisms as compared to other methods, and it can be recommended as a general screening method for the detection of biofilm-producing bacteria in laboratories.


Keywords


Biofilm detection; Microtiter plate assay; Congo red agar; Tube method

References


Siddhiqui S, Afreen U, Kotgire S. Evaluation of Biofilm Formation by Three Different Methods and its Antibiogram with Special Reference to Indwelling Medical Devices from a Tertiary Care Hospital. Ann Pathol Lab Med. 2018; 5(2):171-76.

Giaouris E, Heir E, Hébraud M, Chorianopoulos N, Langsrud S, Møretrø T, et al. Attachment and biofilm formation by foodborne bacteria in meat processing environments: causes, implications, role of bacterial interactions and control by alternative novel methods. Meat Sci. 2014; 97(3):298-309.

Mishra SK, Basukala P, Basukala O, Parajuli K, Pokhrel BM, Rijal BP. Detection of biofilm production and antibiotic resistance pattern in clinical isolates from indwelling medical devices. Curr Microbiol. 2015; 70(1):128-34.

Dua K, Shukla SD, Tekade RK, Hansbro PM. Whether a novel drug delivery system can overcome the problem of biofilms in respiratory diseases? Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2017; 7(1):179-87.

Haji SH. Detection of Biofilm Formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from Clinical Specimens. Zanco J Pure Appl Sci. 2018; 30(4): 83-9.

Ansari MA, Khan HM, Khan AA, Cameotra SS, Saquib Q, Musarrat J. Gum arabic capped-silver nanoparticles inhibit biofilm formation by multi-drug resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Basic Microbiol. 2014; 54(7):688-99.

Römling U, Balsalobre C. Biofilm infections, their resilience to therapy and innovative treatment strategies. J Intern Med. 2012; 272(6):541-61.

Culotti A, Packman AI. Pseudomonas aeruginosa promotes Escherichia coli biofilm formation in nutrient-limited medium. PLoS One. 2014; 9(9):e107186.

Samad A, Khan AA, Sajid M, Zahra R. Assessment of biofilm formation by pseudomonas aeruginosa and hydrodynamic evaluation of microtiter plate assay. J Pak Med Assoc. 2019; 69(5):666-71.

Lima J, Alves LR, Paz J, Rabelo MA, Maciel MAV, Morais MMC. Analysis of biofilm production by clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017; 29(3):310-6.

Kırmusaoğlu S. The methods for detection of biofilm and screening antibiofilm activity of agents. Antimicrobials, Antibiotic Resistance, Antibiofilm Strategies and Activity Methods: IntechOpen. 2019:99.

Nosrati N, Honarmand Jahromy S, Zare Karizi S. Comparison of Tissue Culture Plate, Congo red Agar and Tube Methods for Evaluation of Biofilm Formation among Uropathogenic E. coli Isolates. Iran J Med Microbiol. 2017; 11(3):49-58.

Furtuna DK, Debora K, Wasito EB. Comparison of Microbiological Examination by Test Tube and Congo Red Agar Methods to Detect Biofilm Production on Clinical Isolates. Folia Med Indonesiana. 2018; 54(1):22-8.

Moori-Bakhtiari N, Moslemi M. Phenotypic evaluation of biofilm producing ability in Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Feyz J Kashan Univ Med Sci. 2017; 20(6):525-31.

Dumaru R, Baral R, Shrestha LB. Study of biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance pattern of gram-negative Bacilli among the clinical isolates at BPKIHS, Dharan. BMC Res Notes. 2019; 12(1):38.

Shrestha LB, Bhattarai NR, Khanal B. Comparative evaluation of methods for the detection of biofilm formation in coagulase-negative staphylococci and correlation with antibiogram. Infect Drug Resist. 2018; 11:607-13.

Risal G, Shrestha A, Kunwar S, Paudel G, Dhital R, Budha MB, et al. Detection of biofilm formation by Escherichia coli with its antibiogram profile. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018; 5(9):5.

Rishpana MS, Kabbin JS. Candiduria in Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection with Special Reference to Biofilm Production. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9(10):Dc11-3.

Singhai M, Malik A, Shahid M, Malik MA, Goyal R. A study on device-related infections with special reference to biofilm production and antibiotic resistance. J Glob Infect Dis. 2012; 4(4):193-8.

Lameed O, Olorunshola I, Adesiji Y. Comparison of the Analytical Methods Employed in the Detection of Biofilm-Forming Bacterial Pathogens. Nig J Pure Appl Sci. 2019; 32(1):3396-403.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 © The Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.